Law Brief: Ausley v. Bishop

We are ready to represent the best custom paper writing assistance that can cope with any task like Law Brief: Ausley v. Bishop even at the eleventh hour. The matter is that we posses the greatest base of expert writers. Our staff of freelance writers includes approximately 300 experienced writers are at your disposal all year round. They are striving to provide the best ever services to the most desperate students that have already lost the hope for academic success. We offer the range of the most widely required, however, not recommended for college use papers. It is advisable to use our examples like Law Brief: Ausley v. Bishop in learning at public-education level. Get prepared and be smart with our best essay samples cheap and fast! Get in touch and we will write excellent custom coursework or essay especially for you.

Ausley v. Bishop

FACTS In November 14, Bryan Bishop began working for Andrew Ausley as an apprentice to gain his appraiser’s license. After getting his license in April 17, Ausley wanted to Bishop to sign a new employment contract that included less pay than before. After Bishop refused and decided to open his own office, Ausley told other people that Bishop was unethical and had even stolen files from Ausley’s office. Ausley filed suit that Bishop breached contract and was granted a summary judgment. Bishop appealed the judgment and filed a counterclaim charging Ausley with slander.

ISSUE Whether or not the trial court should have granted Ausley a summary judgement?

LAW A motion for summary judgment may be filed after the complaint, answer and any other pleading have been filed. A summary for judgment is that the party making the motion may support it with sworn statements and other materials. It will be granted only if, when the evidence is views in the light most favorable to the other party, it is clear that there are no factual disputes in contention.




RATIONALE The plaintiff admitted to telling several people that the defendant had committed unethical acts. Since, the defendant is trying to start his own business the statements made by the plaintiff can cause potential harm. The plaintiff also admits that previous charges of by the defendant were dropped.

HOLDING The Court of Appeals of North Carolina held that Bishop had enough proof of his claim for it to go to trial. The court reversed the lower court’s grant of summary judgment and sent the case to trial.



Mind that the sample papers like Law Brief: Ausley v. Bishop presented are to be used for review only. In order to warn you and eliminate any plagiarism writing intentions, it is highly recommended not to use the essays in class. In cases you experience difficulties with essay writing in class and for in class use, order original papers with our expert writers. Cheap custom papers can be written from scratch for each customer that entrusts his or her academic success to our writing team. Order your unique assignment from the best custom writing services cheap and fast!